In other words, the company admitted it that it had no moral compass and would support any candidate, no matter how repugnant, in the pursuit of financial security.Ī period of public outrage followed. “Target supports causes and candidates based strictly on issues that affect our retail and business interests,” wrote one company representative. ![]() In 2010, Target’s LGBTQ support took a backseat to electing Rep. Neither Target nor Minnesota Forward were focused on civil rights - instead, their mission was the consolidation of wealth for large corporations - but their chosen candidate, Tom Emmer, had declared himself a fanatical opponent of queer people. That’s when a report emerged that the company had given $150,000 to a group called “Minnesota Forward,” which was paying to get a wildly anti-gay candidate elected governor of the state. ![]() ![]() Most people gave little thought to Target’s position on queer politics until 2010.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |